To press, or not to press?

...many clients ask when it comes to doing a production run of CD's. There are two main ways of reproducing CD's, duplication and pressing (sometimes referred to as 'replication'). Each has it's own advantages and disadvantages.

When your CD's have been duplicated, they have been recorded individually onto pre-manufactured CD-R's, in a similar way to how you would 'burn' your own CD's. This method is best suited when the number of copies is less than about 750 or when turnaround times are very tight (typically less than 8 working days). Depending on quantity, print requirements and the size of the master, a 500 CD-R duplication run can take 24 hours from the time that a master is received.

CD's that are pressed have to go through a different manufacturing process. To give a simple description a glass master is made, from this a stamper is produced which is fitted into a press. Liquid polycarbonate is then fed into the press, the image is then stamped into the polycarbonate as it cools. After that the reflective, silver layer is applied and the disc is then sealed. Once that process is completed the CD goes to be screen printed. As you can probably appreciate this process can take anything between 7 and 10 working days depending on the production schedules at that time.

So which one is the best?

The simple answer is neither, it depends on your requirements. CD-R duplication has speed and flexibility, however on quantities over 750 units is typically more expensive. CD Pressing is slower but generally cheaper on higher volumes.

Contrary to popular belief there is now no difference in the quality of the recording, reputable companies providing pressing and/or CD duplication should offer guarantees regardless of your chosen method.

In conclusion you really need to decide on what is important. Are you working to tight schedules? How many CD's are you looking for? Is cost a decisive factor? With correct consultation you should be able to make an informed decision that best suits your needs.

October 2003